Psychology Aspects in Spearmans, Stenbergs and Gardners Models of Intelligence

Intelligence is among the most studied topics in the field of psychology. Ironically, it has not been possible to come up with one definition of intelligence acceptable in the whole world. Some scholars believe that intelligence is a single general ability while others believe that it incorporates many aspects like skills, talents and capacities. Nevertheless, every scholar comes up with a different definition suitable for a particular model of intelligence. Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Psychology Aspects in Spearman’s, Stenberg’s and Gardner’s Models of Intelligence specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Various scholars have come up with different models of intelligence with an aim of explaining and understanding the whole concept. However, even though models are different, all have similar concepts were it not for the fact that they are explained differently. However, this does not negate th e fact there are some notable differences. Bent on that, this paper shall discuss Spearman’s, Stenberg’s and Gardner’s models of intelligence and narrow down to major differences and similarities. Scholars describe intelligence differently especially after testing their theories. Spearman describes intelligence as a cognitive ability or g factor that can be measured numerically and expressed as such (Plucker para 4 ). He was able to make the conclusion after conducting a number of mental aptitude tests and discovered that the scores of the tests were similar (Sternberg p. 18). On the other hand, Gardner unlike Spearman illustrates that it is not accurate to measure intelligence numerically because according to him, it is composed of skills and abilities that are greatly valued in different cultures. In addition, his model explains that there are eight different types of intelligences which are inclusive of bodily kinesthetic, musical, verbal-linguistic, logical , naturalistic, intra-personal and interpersonal forms of intelligence. Finally, although Stenberg agreed that there is more than one form of intelligence, he proposed that some of the Gardner’s forms of intelligence can be perfectly described as human talents (Gardner Para 4). However, he grouped intelligence in to three categories which include practical, creative and analytical intelligence. As much as there are some differences between different models of intelligence, similarities present cannot be overlooked. All models seem to have a clear concept that intelligence is the cognitive ability of an individual that helps individuals become successful in certain areas of their lives. For instance, Sternberg explains that intelligence which results from a good balance between analytical, practical and creative abilities helps individuals to be successful within different contexts in the social environment (Sternberg pp. 92). Similarly, Gardner also proposed that different types of intelligence which are generated by mental energy enable individuals solve problems and create products that are important in different cultural settings. Advertising Looking for essay on psychology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Lastly, Spearman model also illustrates the same concept of intelligence which is the cognitive mental ability of an individual that helps them solve some problems and that is why he used tests to measure intelligence and latter expressed it numerically as a g factor (Matthews, Zeidner Roberts pp. 91). It has been difficult to determine the most comprehensive model of intelligence because all have strong and weak points. However, according to Paik (Para 7), Gardner’s model of intelligence is the most comprehensive model because it points out more than one form of intelligence. Moreover, it has some biological foundation because there are seven different parts of brains which are re sponsible for each type of intelligence. Apart from the solid biological basis, the theory makes it possible to measure and identify other types of intelligence apart from logical, linguistic and spatial. The only problem is difficulty in experimentation because human brain is sensitive and complicated. Although there is wide range of differences between different models of intelligence, all of them are important because they have contributed greatly in helping people understand various aspects of the same. For instance, it has been possible to identify and appreciate the fact that people have different abilities which help them to become successful in the social world. As much as each theory is criticized, the importance of each cannot be overstated. In addition, all have different weaknesses and strengths. Works Cited Gardner, Howard. American Psychologist and Educator. 2007. Web. Matthews, Gerald, Moshe Zeidner and Richard D. Roberts. Emotional intelligence: science and myth. Cam bridge: MIT Press, 2004. Print. Paik, Han S. One Intelligence or Many? Alternative Approaches to Cognitive Abilities. 1998. Web.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Psychology Aspects in Spearman’s, Stenberg’s and Gardner’s Models of Intelligence specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Plucker, Jonathan. Charles Spearman. 2007. Web. Sternberg, Robert J. Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Print. This essay on Psychology Aspects in Spearman’s, Stenberg’s and Gardner’s Models of Intelligence was written and submitted by user Araceli Leonard to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Free Essays on Wolfgang Kohler

Gestalt Psychology Today By Wolfgang KÃ ¶hler In this piece Kohler talks about certain schools of psychology (Especially Behaviorism) and other sciences, while talking about the new theories in Gestalt psychology. He begins by talking about the history of Gestalt psychology and mentions how some of the history is generally unknown. He points out how Gestalt psychologists have established certain qualities of the components of sensations. He does this as a precursor to the view that perceptual situations do not solely have independent components. He then begins to describe how interactions are taking place all around us and it is not that important to simply find each independent part of what we perceive, but rather view events as a whole. Kohler mentions many names that have contributed to these theories that are being discussed now. He proposes that the way psychologists have looked at perception and sensation is a bore. The way it should be looked at is that human life is dynamic and we need to look at the bigger picture. Kohler then mentions the American Gestalt psychologists and their interest in physics and how their work helped change the view on some natural sciences. He then goes on about how that should be used as a guiding tool to explore newer theories. A long drawn-out discussion goes on about how we should not be focused only on discoveries of the past, but rather, focus on potential innovative discoveries. In the next part of the essay Kohler talks about the use of the term insight when referring to how a person makes a decision. He uses very helpful examples and illustrations of what he is trying to explain. I found that section to be the most thought provoking of the entire essay. Kohler then begins to discuss current trends in psychology and why he does not approve of them. In specific Kohler does not approve of the use of extreme caution simply because it has become negativism. This, he be... Free Essays on Wolfgang Kohler Free Essays on Wolfgang Kohler Gestalt Psychology Today By Wolfgang KÃ ¶hler In this piece Kohler talks about certain schools of psychology (Especially Behaviorism) and other sciences, while talking about the new theories in Gestalt psychology. He begins by talking about the history of Gestalt psychology and mentions how some of the history is generally unknown. He points out how Gestalt psychologists have established certain qualities of the components of sensations. He does this as a precursor to the view that perceptual situations do not solely have independent components. He then begins to describe how interactions are taking place all around us and it is not that important to simply find each independent part of what we perceive, but rather view events as a whole. Kohler mentions many names that have contributed to these theories that are being discussed now. He proposes that the way psychologists have looked at perception and sensation is a bore. The way it should be looked at is that human life is dynamic and we need to look at the bigger picture. Kohler then mentions the American Gestalt psychologists and their interest in physics and how their work helped change the view on some natural sciences. He then goes on about how that should be used as a guiding tool to explore newer theories. A long drawn-out discussion goes on about how we should not be focused only on discoveries of the past, but rather, focus on potential innovative discoveries. In the next part of the essay Kohler talks about the use of the term insight when referring to how a person makes a decision. He uses very helpful examples and illustrations of what he is trying to explain. I found that section to be the most thought provoking of the entire essay. Kohler then begins to discuss current trends in psychology and why he does not approve of them. In specific Kohler does not approve of the use of extreme caution simply because it has become negativism. This, he be...

Cross-Cultural Transaction Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Cross-Cultural Transaction Management - Essay Example The Chinese space for individuals to make decisions appear to experience some direct influence from the government, the US has a liberal space for individuals to decide on many issues without a direct influence from the government. Politics around the social scene affects the cultural definition between the two countries with the Chinese culture being closely monitored and dictated upon by the strong political forces. The US democratic model is perhaps one of the most liberalized in the world making it one of the leaders in the most favored nation (MFN) in economic terms. In contrast, the Chinese political setting has been a socialist model that appears to be on the opposite end when compared to democracy, which depicts the setting as intolerant of democratic values and principles. Entering the Chinese market to set up shop is likely to be subjected to tight government bureaucracies than in the US. The government cronies found all over China may pose the greatest challenge to setting out investment due to their political inclination thereby affecting foreign investment. In addition, the highly patriarchal cultural system that is established in the political arena hinders the role of women in Chinese economy.The Motosuzhou management makes are defined by high political influence right from the organization structure. Considerations of the political influence that the Electrowide joint venture may have on the Chinese foreign policy of isolation based on its government structure come into the equation.... that the government has accorded Motosuzhou along side other 1000 companies in terms of liberal decision making, the role of Minister of Finance in the internal structure contradicts this assumption. Socialist model of the Chinese culture that emphasizes on understanding social attributes of the negotiation panel forwarded by Electrowide also consumed a lot of time that would otherwise have made progress in terms of the Americans’ estimation. Gender discrimination of female negotiator in the Electrowide team was not welcome from the Americans causing more frustrations. Negotiations failure between Electrowide and Motosuzhou Joint venture negotiations must contemplate the selection criteria of a partner for success in such negotiations, which were heavily compromised in the Electrowide and Motosuzhou case. During the negotiations, it was not clear what each partner was willing to obtain and offer as part of the joint venture. The Chinese team acted casually and did not utilize the time as the American team expected during the negotiations. Several assumptions were made by both parties which were not the exact positions of the intended entry strategies for the other parties. The accounting policies that the two firms applied in their operations were very different, for instance, in the treatment of manufacturing costs and their allocation in the books. For better performance of the joint venture, it is important that the internal operations of the firms are not very different for purposes of harmonizing the joint operations. As it also appeared in the disparities, Motosuzhou did not strictly comply with audit rules which are fundament in American corporate operations. Thirdly, communication is a basic necessity in the negotiations of a joint venture as well as during